Local Restaurants Panicked Over Styrofoam Ban

06:48 PM PDT on Tuesday, July 8, 2008

By CHRIS DANIELS / KING 5 News

SEATTLE – The answer to “paper or plastic?” may depend on how much you want to spend, in Seattle at least.

The Seattle City Council and Mayor Greg Nickels plan a public forum at 7 p.m. Tuesday at City Hall to discuss adding a bag fee to your grocery bill and banning Styrofoam productsThe council will discuss proposed legislation which would ban Styrofoam to-go containers and charge a 20-cent fee for each bag you use at the store.

The idea is to encourage reusable, rather than disposable, bag use.

But the groundbreaking environmental move has some restaurants in a panic.

At World Wrapps, they would have to find a new way to keep their popular smoothies from melting. The drinks are served in Styrofoam cups.

“I don’t mind if it’s melted and warmer, it tastes good that way,” said Diane Gainier, customer

At the Queen Anne Café, Styrofoam is a staple. Owners would have to find a new way to dish up food “to go.”

The Seattle Coalition for Responsible Recycling says it will hold a press conference immediately proceeding the meeting Tuesday. They say the fee would cause an undue burden on struggling businesses.

But city officials say the objective is not to penalize people.

“It’s not saying you’re bad people and we’re trying to get rid of you. The objective is to get everyone moving in the right direction,” said Richard Conlin, Seattle City Council Chair.

Restaurants and grocery stores would have get rid of Styrofoam or other polystyrene containers in January.

If approved, the city would impose a 20-cent fee for disposable shopping bags at groceries and other stores, starting next year. It would apply to paper or plastic bags.

The city says the fee would encourage the use of reusable bags and reduce the number of disposable bags in the city by half.

In July 2010, the ban would include plastics, including utensils and deli containers. Everything would have to be biodegradable

~~~

Rebecca

Country Meadow Ltd.

Eco-Friendly Spa Products

Gentle on your body…

Gentle on the earth…

www.countrymeadowltd.com

G-8 Endorses halving global emissions by 2050

updated 12:51 a.m. PT, Tues., July. 8, 2008

RUSUTSU, Japan – The Group of Eight leading industrial nations on Tuesday endorsed halving world emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050, edging forward in the battle against global warming but stopping short of tough, nearer-term targets.

The G-8 countries — the United States, Japan, Russia, Germany, France, Britain, Canada and Italy — also called on all major economies to join in the effort to stem the potentially dangerous rise in world temperatures.

“The G-8 nations came to a mutual recognition that this target — cutting global emissions by at least 50 percent by 2050 — should be a global target,” said Japanese Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda, who announced the endorsement.

The G-8 last year at a summit in Germany pledged to consider the 2050 target, and this year’s Japanese hosts had hoped to solidify that commitment at the meeting in Toyako, northern Japan.

Under pressure
The G-8 has been under pressure to secure commitments by wealthy nations to push forward stalled U.N.-led talks on forging a new accord to battle global warming by the end of next year. Tuesday’s statement, however, addressed world emissions rather than just those produced by wealthy countries.

The United States hailed the agreement, which Washington said fit with its stance that all major economies — such as China, India and others — need to participate in reducing emissions. Major developing nations have urged wealthy countries to take the first step in cutting greenhouse gases.

“It has always been the case that a long-term goal is one that must be shared. So the G-8 has offered today is a G-8 view of what that goal could be and should be but that can only occur with the agreement of all the other parties,” said Jim Connaughton, chairman of the White House’s Council on Environmental Quality.

Criticism persists
Environmentalists criticized the statement for failing to go beyond the G-8 statement last year.

“So little progress after a whole year of Minister meetings and negotiations is not only a wasted opportunity, it falls dangerously short of what is needed to protect people and nature from climate change,” said Kim Carstensen, director of the World Wildlife Fund’s Global Climate Initiative.

Environmentalists have argued that the 50 percent reduction target is insufficient, and have clamored for ambitious targets for countries to cut emissions by 2020. Japan itself has set a national target for cutting emissions by between 60 percent and 80 percent by 2050, but has not set a midterm goal.

Such shorter-term targets have been much more difficult to reach consensus on. The United States, for instance, has argued that meeting a Europe-supported goal of reducing emissions by between 25 and 40 percent by 2020 is unrealistic.

Individual targets
In a nod to such disagreements, Fukuda said the G-8 countries would set individual targets.

“The G-8 will implement aggressive midterm total emission reduction targets on a country by country basis,” he said.

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso said the agreement constituted a “new, shared vision by the major economies” that would support the U.N.-led effort on a new global warming accord.

“This is a strong signal to citizens around the world,” he said in a statement, calling for a renewed push behind the U.N. talks, which aim to conclude a new pact at a meeting in Copenhagen, Denmark, in December 2009.

~~~

Rebecca

Country Meadow Ltd.

Eco-Friendly Spa Products

Gentle on your body…

Gentle on the earth…

www.countrymeadowltd.com