Mon 31 Mar '08

Chicken Curry = ‘Things in my Food!’

I like good food..but is has to be simple….

You know….chicken and rice, steak and potatoes, hot dogs and mac/cheese…..

I can handle spices, onions and garlic in my food but I do not like anything out of the ordinary or fancy….

In our my husbands quest to eat healthier he has been cutting out recipes printed in our local paper. He handed me yet another one and said ‘let’s give it a try’.

My mouth said ok but as I was going over the ingredient list my mind was reeling (and getting ready to shut down…)….It has (gasp) THINGS in it!

THINGS that I just don’t like and no person should be made to eat not to mention I had NO IDEA what couscous was (and no…it’s not a form of rice).

Carrots, Raisins and Coconut Milk!….Could I do it? I knew I could make it but I wasn’t certain I could force myself to eat those THINGS!

After the dish was made I took a small bite of chicken (just the chicken mind you…no things……) so far, so good. Next I took a small bite with the things included and I’m embarrased to say THIS STUFF WAS GOOD…even with the addition of the dreaded coconut milk!

I have made this recipe twice and I can honestly say I just can’t get enough. It is super simple and very flavorful.

I still will never eat carrots or raisins by themselves but no longer will I have an automatic revulsion to them when I see them as a recipe ingredient!

I will post the recipe as is then at the end I will post a few tips that I used.

Quick Chicken Curry

1 c. Water

1 c. Couscous

2 tbl. Olive Oil

1 Med. Yellow Onion, diced

3 Garlic Cloves, minced

2 Carrots, cut into very thin matchsticks

1 c. Raisins

1 tbl. Curry Powder

Meat from 1-2lb. Roasted Chicken

1 c. Coconut Milk

Salt/Pepper to taste

3 Green Onions

In small pan bring water to a boil. Turn off heat and add the couscous, stir once then cover and let sit until the rest of the recipe is complete.

In large skillet heat olive oil, add the onion, garlic, carrots and raisins. Saute just until tender, about 5 min.

Add the curry powder and cook stirring often for 3 min. Add the chicken and coconut milk. Bring to a simmer and season with salt/pepper.

Transfer couscous to a large bowl and fluff. Add green onions and toss. Spoon the chicken curry over the couscous.

Makes 6 Servings

Tips:

Couscous – Instead of getting plain couscous get a flavored one that cooks in only 5 minutes. We like the garlic flavored one. One box is enough.

Chicken – Instead of getting a precooked whole chicken get a big family package of skinless/boneless chicken breasts. Season with salt/pepper and cook at 400 for 50 min. Cut breasts in half and cook another 10 min. or until done. Let cool. I used 5 whole chicken breasts (shredded). The rest of the chicken we use for chicken tacos during the week!

Coconut Milk – The recipe says use 1 cup which I did the first time. The second time I used the entire can. Make sure you save the coconut milk so you can add more if needed.

Mixing - Once the chicken curry was done I mixed the cooked couscous and the green onion in with the chicken all in the same skillet.

I really really like this recipe which is a complete suprise as it contains things that I don’t like but when you take a mouthful you get a burst of flavor. I really don’t taste the carrots and the raisins lend a sort of sweetness to the dish…as for the coconut milk…it makes the dish a little creamy but you can’t really tell it’s there!

If you decide to make this dish do not skimp on the things….you need them for flavor. And if you are like me and don’t like these specific things I urge you to give it a try…you just might be suprised…like I was!

Make this dish then come back here and let us know how you liked it.

Rebecca

Country Meadow Ltd.

Eco-Friendly Spa Products

Gentle on your body…

Gentle on the earth…

New Logo

www.countrymeadowltd.com

Fri 28 Mar '08

Pouches, Wallets & Handbags….

Happy Friday!

Wanted to end this week with some happy shopping and an introduction to JPatPurses!

You can find everything from handmade coin pouches, zipper pouches, wallets and handbags. Items are very well made and customer service is great!

I was looking for a small pouch to hold all of my chap/lip stick in and found one that was made with a cool fabric in our company colors (green/brown). I love the soft fabric, design and colors and now I see they also have a gadget (or cell phone!) carrier in the very same fabric!

jpatpurses

Wishing everyone a happy, productive (or relaxing as the case may be!) weekend!

Rebecca

Country Meadow Ltd.

Eco-Friendly Spa Products

Gentle on your body…

Gentle on the earth…

New Logo

www.countrymeadowltd.com

Thu 27 Mar '08

Is Your Diet Giving You Wrinkles…???

From Real Age:

Is Your Diet Giving You Wrinkles?
Written by RealAge, Inc., peer-reviewed by Dr. Axel Goetz, December 2003

Wrinkles may be an inevitable part of aging, but that doesn’t mean fighting them is useless. Protecting your skin from exposure to ultraviolet radiation is the most significant thing you can do to prevent wrinkles, sagging, and discoloration. And, some people try invasive techniques, such as chemical peels, Botox, dermal fillers, or surgery.

But those efforts are all done from the outside. What about protecting your skin from the inside?

Can something as simple as modifying what you eat and drink help you smooth the lines on your face or prevent future wrinkles?

Erase wrinkles NO, look younger YES
Studies show that what you eat, or don’t eat, has a definite effect on the health of your skin. As the outermost barrier of the body and your largest organ, the skin is continuously exposed to various sources of stress, including many environmental factors. So, although a new diet won’t clear away all your wrinkles or halt skin aging, nutrition can make a huge difference not only in how you look, but also how you feel. This in turn will influence how young or old you may appear to be.

Food fight… against aging
Researchers are just beginning to explore the extent of diet’s role in the skin aging process. One recent study revealed that people whose diets are rich in vegetables, beans, olive oil, nuts, and multigrain breads are less likely to wrinkle than those who feast on red meat, butter, and sugary foods.

Experts suspect that antioxidant vitamins A, C, and E and the minerals zinc and selenium may keep wrinkles at bay by reducing the amount of potentially damaging free radicals produced by skin cells. One study revealed that a supplement that included a combination of these antioxidant vitamins helped protect the skin from aging due to solar UV exposure.

Another study suggests that for light-skinned people, consuming a diet rich in carotenoids offers similar UV protection and also may contribute to healthy skin coloring.

To achieve a healthy, youthful glow, turn away from the sun and turn to carotenoid-rich foods such as cantaloupe, apricots, carrots, sweet potatoes, spinach, and other fruits and vegetables that have deep green, yellow, orange, and red hues. A multivitamin may provide your skin further protection against aging.

In addition, several research reviews have revealed that botanical antioxidants show promise as an effective means of protecting skin cells against ultraviolet radiation; this is another good reason to eat at least four servings of fruits and five of vegetables each day.

Some Healthy Food Choices for Your Skin and Body
Choose Nutrients Supplied
Vegetables
Spinach, leaf lettuce, carrots, squash, sweet potatoes
Vitamin A (carotenoids)
Tomatoes, bell peppers Vitamin C
Fruits
Papayas, mangoes, cantaloupe
Vitamin A (carotenoids)
Oranges, grapefruits Vitamin C
Other Foods
Fortified whole-grain cereals (check label)
Vitamins B, D, zinc, selenium
Nuts, sunflower seeds Vitamin E, zinc
Salmon, tuna Vitamins D, E, calcium, omega-3 oils, selenium, protein
Vegetable oil Vitamins D, E
Low-fat milk Vitamin A (retinol), calcium, zinc, selenium
Eggs Vitamins A (retinol), E, B, zinc
Legumes, dried beans Vitamins B, zinc

Find more skin-healthy food selections with the RealAge Vitamins and Nutrients Best Bets.

Visit the water fountain of youth—several times a day!
Imagine what happens to a plant when it goes without water for too long. It begins to droop, then it becomes dry and brittle. Watering the plant may bring it back, but it will likely have damaged leaves. Water works similarly within people. By drinking water, you moisturize your skin from the inside out, helping to maintain its elasticity and suppleness—less drooping, less drying, and less damage. Monitoring such things as your thirst and energy levels, as well as the concentration of your urine, is a good way to assess whether you’re getting enough to drink. Alcoholic beverages and caffeinated drinks such as coffee, tea, and colas don’t count; they have a diuretic effect that may deplete your body’s water supply. Exercise and low humidity climates also can affect your body’s water level. Remember to drink extra water each day to account for these factors.

The bottom line: you’ll get out what you put in
It may not be a sure cure for crows’ feet, brow furrows, or laugh lines, but improving a few food and behavior choices could save your skin. Although studies specific to wrinkle prevention are currently limited, a
host of other studies reveal that the same vitamins and nutrients
that may protect your skin also are beneficial to the health of your eyes, teeth, nails, bones, and circulatory system
. So, if a more youthful appearance is what you seek, then skin is only a portion of the equation. By eating a diverse diet, including five servings of vegetables per day, you can make your RealAge as much as 4 years younger. And adding more antioxidants and essential oils can bring out a healthier and younger-looking you.  RA

Healthy Tips

Look for foods containing vitamins A and C, zinc, lean proteins, and essential fatty acids. These are great for healthy skin.
Leave the skin on fruits and vegetables (wash well) and eat raw or lightly cooked for optimal nutrition.
Minimize intake of simple or high glycemic-index carbs, such as enriched bread or flour products, processed and refined foods, candy, and soft drinks. These are often nutrient poor and high in sugar.
Include complex or low-glycemic index carbohydrates, such as whole-grain breads and cereals, and legumes.

*****

Rebecca

Country Meadow Ltd.

Eco-Friendly Spa Products

Gentle on your body…

Gentle on the earth…

New Logo

www.countrymeadowltd.com

Wed 26 Mar '08

Oil Giant Backs Off ‘Green’ Push…

In case you missed this article on msn.com this morning:

Oil Giant Backs Off ‘Green’ Push

By Michael Brush

For years, BP PLC (BP, news, msgs) commanded the admiration of environmentalists with aggressive campaigns to reduce carbon emissions and develop alternative energy sources.

But the former British Petroleum is now alienating the very activists it was winning over earlier with its groundbreaking “Beyond Petroleum” program to develop “green” energy from the wind and the sun.

Even as other oil giants tout their own environmental efforts, the one-time leader’s reversal has environmentalists wondering whether Big Oil can really live up to its promises to be more green.

“To say that ‘BP’ stands for Beyond Petroleum is such an utter joke. It should stand for Being Phony,” says Gregg Steiner, whose Los Angeles business, Green Life Guru, helps homeowners and businesses become more eco-friendly. “It makes me want to throw up every time I see BP lying to us on Sunday morning while watching ‘Meet the Press.’ It is all smoke and mirrors.”

Back to petroleum?

In its most recent annual report, BP maintains that it still has “aspirations of no or minimal damage to the environment” when developing energy sources. Environmentalists aren’t convinced.

Their chief gripe: BP has jumped on the Canadian oil-sands bandwagon. Green activists say developing that oil will cause vast damage stretching from Canada to the U.S. refineries where the gooey source of hydrocarbons will be converted into oil.

Activists also worry that new BP chief Anthony Hayward wants to crack the whip on the company’s green operations. Will the green divisions that don’t help the share price go up be dropped?

That all seems a far cry from the tone set by Lord John Browne, the company’s chief when it adopted the “Beyond Petroleum” slogan in 2000. Haywood took over when Browne left last May.

“There was this one shining moment where they looked like they were going to be the good guys, and they’ve just rapidly moved away from it,’ says Josh Mogerman of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).

Here’s a closer look at why environmentalists say BP’s marketing is now little more than “greenwashing.”

Tapping Canada’s oil sands

Stretching through much of the Canadian provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan is a hydrocarbon-rich mixture of bitumen, sand, water and clay known as tar sands or oil sands. These huge deposits give Canada the second-largest petroleum holdings in the world, behind only Saudi Arabia.

Oil sands are costly to tap, but with the price of oil up fivefold over the past decade, companies are eager.

After holding out for years, BP last December inked two ventures with Canada’s Husky Energy. BP took a 50% interest in Husky’s Sunrise field in Alberta, and Husky got a 50% stake in a BP refinery near Toledo, Ohio. BP says it will increase the capacity of that refinery to process heavier grades of crude oil and bitumen, the substance that contains oil. “They divested their interests a decade ago, and now there has been an about-face,” says Simon Dyer of the Pembina Institute, a Canadian environmental think tank. “It’s not consistent with a message of green energy production.”

Why would BP risk its eco-friendly image? Simple. BP’s energy production declined 3% in 2007, and operating profits were down 6.4%. Those negative trends have brought growing pressure from analysts to build oil reserves fast.

Citigroup (C, news, msgs) analyst James Neale cut his rating on BP to “sell” from “hold” in February, warning investors that the decline in BP’s core oil-and-gas production has been “surprisingly high.” Neale says in 2000 BP projected that production would rise 21% to 3.4 million barrels a day by 2007, from 2.8 million. Instead, it dropped 86%, to 1.5 million.

Dirty business?

But environmentalists say developing Canadian tar sands carries a huge cost:

  • Greenhouse gas. Producing oil from tar sands requires so much energy that it creates three to five times as much carbon dioxide as production from wells, says Bill Moomaw, the head of the Center for International Environment and Resource Policy at Tufts University’s Fletcher School.

    Aside from the heavy machinery used in mining, producers use enormous amounts of steam and hot water to extract the crude. Largely because of tar-sand production, Canada’s greenhouse-gas emissions will probably rise 30% from 1990 through 2010, even though the country pledged to reduce emissions by 6% in that time frame as part of the Kyoto accords, says Dyer, of the Pembina Institute.

    Dyer believes “capturing” and storing carbon underground would only add a few dollars a barrel to the cost of production. But BP’s partner Husky isn’t using carbon capture in Canada, and BP recently dropped plans for a carbon-capture experiment in Scotland. “It would be fantastic to see some real leadership on this from an oil-sands operator,” he says.

    BP wants to use carbon capture to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, says spokesman Scott Dean, but first wants Canada to develop a regulatory framework mandating it for all energy companies “so there is a level playing field so that early adopters aren’t penalized.” He says BP is using carbon capture at a project in Algeria.

  • Damage to wildlife. The extraction process used by Husky may be more eco-friendly that some; it uses steam to melt and drain away bitumen underground. But it still requires roads and pipelines that slice up forests — a huge impact on the local ecosystem.
  • Acid rain. The Pembina Institute also claims that production of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide linked to mining tar sands has caused a spike in acid rain in Western Canada.

BP’s involvement in Canadian oil sands is simply part of an overall trend in energy production toward exploitation of “heavier” forms of crude oil around the globe as lighter “sweet” crude supplies are used up, responds BP spokesman Dean. “It is inevitable that not only the Canadian oil sands but other forms of heavier crude oil will be developed.”

Processing heavier forms of crude produces more pollution than processing light crude.

Dean says BP supports a mandatory system of “cap and trade” for carbon emissions in the U.S. — in which the government sets limits on carbon emissions and allows companies to trade credits for reduced emissions to offer an economic incentive to bring down pollution. “We advocate this because we believe there needs to be a global solution to climate change, and we believe the best way to do that is to put a cap on carbon,” says Dean.

BP also says it plans to reduce its own carbon emissions by 24 million tons per year, which it says is the equivalent of making the entire city of Chicago carbon neutral.

A US problem, too

BP’s plans to process heavier grades of crude as well as bitumen at its U.S. refineries rankles green groups, too.

In addition to its project with Husky, BP wants to add production capacity to its Whiting, Ind., refinery near Chicago to process heavy crude from Canada. “That is really scary to environmentalists,” says NRDC’s Mogerman. “It is heavy sour crude, which means it has a lot of sulfur and it takes a lot of energy to break it down. We have real concerns about significant increases in CO2 and carbon-monoxide particulate matter.”

The NRDC claims permits being considered by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management let BP avoid federal pollution controls by excluding emissions from three new flares at the refinery. Refineries use flares as safety valves to burn off excess gasses.

“IDEM allowed BP to assume that the large and costly flares will not be used at all. In comparable refineries, flares emit thousands of tons of dangerous pollutants annually,” said NRDC attorney Ann Alexander in a statement.

BP’s Dean responds that the three flares will only be used in rare emergencies, so it makes sense to exclude them.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently cited BP for several Clean Air Act violations at its Whiting refinery.

Alternative energy

Environmental advocates read recent comments by BP chief Hayward as an ominous sign for the company’s alternative-energy division. At a meeting with analysts and investors in late February, Hayward said BP will expect a bigger contribution to shareholder value from such efforts.

Senior BP managers later said that doesn’t mean an outright sale of the division, launched in 2005. But given that competitor ExxonMobil (XOM, news, msgs) has a return on equity nearly 50% higher than BP’s, green advocates worry what it does mean. (BP’s stock, by the way, is down about 5% over the last year — better than the S&P 500 ($INX), but not Exxon, which is up 13%.)

“It seems clear if the alternative-energy units have to be judged by whether they make money or have prospects of making money, that puts them on notice,” says Myron Ebell, the director of Energy and Global Warming Policy at the Competitive Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C. “Because most of the units don’t make money or have any prospects of making money and to the extent that they do it is because of government programs and subsidies.”

But BP spokesman Neil Chapman says the company still plans to invest $8 billion in its alternative-energy businesses between 2005 and 2015, “more than anyone else in alternative energy.” “We haven’t changed our commitment to the alternative-energy business. We believe we are growing a strong and viable business which offers an excellent growth opportunity and positions us well for the future,” says Chapman.

Chapman says BP will have 450 megawatts of capacity from wind power by the end of this year, up from 30 megawatts in 2006, and that it is adding a wind turbine a day. BP is developing hydrogen power and carbon sequestration projects in California, and it is doubling its investment in solar energy development this year. “These are positive demonstrations of our commitment to the alternative energy business for growing wind, solar and hydrogen power, and carbon sequestration,” said Chapman.

And not all environmentalists have thrown in the towel on BP. “They are still the leader in terms of sustainability,” says Julie Gorte, the vice president for sustainable investing at Pax World Management, which considers the green profiles of energy companies before investing in them. She cites the company’s ongoing efforts to reduce its carbon emissions, BPs efforts to develop alternative-energy sources and a $500 million contribution to academic research on green energy development.

“Most corporations support good causes,” answers NRDC’s Mogerman. “This is an issue of how they portray themselves in the media compared to what they are doing to impact the rest of the world. They could live up to the image they portray. But they chose not to.”

At the time of publication, Michael Brush did not own or control shares of any of the companies mentioned in this column.

***

Rebecca

Country Meadow Ltd.

Eco-Friendly Spa Products

Gentle on your body…

Gentle on the earth…

New Logo

www.countrymeadowltd.com

Tue 25 Mar '08

Preservative Free Marketing….

Deceptive marketing is out there and if you don’t know what to look for you may be disappointed. It is not outright lying but it is falsely representing a product as something it is not!

While browsing the internet I came across several body products on various sites that headlined their products as PRESERVATIVE FREE! While preservative free is nice I was skeptical and checked out the ingredient labels to verify what exactly the product contained and was disappointed….none of the products contained water (explanation below).

What these people/companies count on is the general public’s lack of knowledge of the how’s and why’s of body product ingredients and the manufacturing process.

**Any cosmetic/body product that has water as an ingredient MUST contain some type of preservative system to prevent the growth of mold, bacteria and yeast (which by the way can NOT be seen with the naked eye!).

**Any cosmetic/body product that has the potential for water to be introduced during normal use (ie: sugar scrubs) must contain a preservative system to prevent the growth of the above mentioned ‘nasties’.

Now here is the kicker..and deceptive marketing…..

**Any cosmetic/body product that does NOT contain water as an ingredient does NOT have to have a preservative system in place!

Water is the key ingredient in any product that can and will promote bacteria, mold and yeast growth unless a preservative system is used.

As a cosmetic/body product company it angers me to see people/companies market their products as something they are not or better yet….implying that an ingredient (in this case cosmetic preservatives) are bad for you! Tell me you would rather have mold, bacteria and yeast to slather all over your body and I will grow wings and fly!

PRESERVATIVE FREE marketing lets you assume #1-Cosmetic preservatives are bad for you, and #2-Their products are better because they don’t contain preservatives…even though it is not necessary as it doesn’t contain water!

So the next time you see a cosmetic/body product being marketed as preservative free read the ingredient label and if it does not contain water then preservatives were not necessary in the first place. I personally would be hesitant to purchase any product from a company that uses deceptive marketing. Makes you wonder what else they are up to! (This goes for all products not just body products! Be informed as to what you are buying).

Here is another hint (and is used in deceptive marketing): Vitamin E, Rosemary Oil Extract (ROE) or Grapeseed Extract (GSE) are NOT natural preservatives. They will NOT prevent the growth of mold, bacteria or yeast! These items are anti-oxidants which are used to extend the shelf life of oils and prevent rancidity.

Rebecca

Country Meadow Ltd.

Eco-Friendly Spa Products

Gentle on your body…

Gentle on the earth…

New Logo

www.countrymeadowltd.com

Thu 20 Mar '08

First Day of Spring….

I am soooo excited…..

Today is the FIRST day of Spring!!!

Yes it’s cloudy and gray and it looks like storm clouds are getting ready to open up and rain  pour….and the snow level is supposed to drop to 500′ tomorrow and we still light off our wood stove in the evenings……

but…

It’s the FIRST day of Spring!!!

Why am I so excited????

Because the birds are now singing early in the morning….

Because daylight hours are getting longer…

Because buds and green growth are on most of the plants…

Because spring time trees are now in beautiful pink bloom…

Because our pond fish are now starting to swim around…

Because I saw our first hummingbird pulling fluff from the cattails in our pond for their nests…

Because soon my husband will have to mow the lawn (and yes, I’m one of those weird people who love the smell of fresh cut grass!)…

Because I know after spring comes……

SUMMER!

Tell us why YOU like spring!

(you will need to register to post and all posts are moderated so it may take up to 24 hrs. for your post to appear)

Rebecca

Country Meadow Ltd.

Eco-Friendly Spa Products

Gentle on your body…

Gentle on the earth…

New Logo

www.countrymeadowltd.com

Wed 19 Mar '08

How do You Get Handbags From Vintage Cars???

Wow…Talk about a niche (and very, very cool!) market!

Kim White Handbags takes vintage auto material and creates unique and very hip handbags and belts…which you will never find anywhere else.

Each bag is tagged with the year and make of the fabric so you know exactly what car your bag comes from.

She has also uncovered vintage floral material originally intended for use in furniture from the 50’s – 70’s.

All products are made in the U.S.A.

This is my favorite:

Kim White Handbags

Rebecca

Country Meadow Ltd.

Eco-Friendly Spa Products

Gentle on your body…

Gentle on the earth…

New Logo

www.countrymeadowltd.com

Tue 18 Mar '08

Pearls of Sand/Monoi Soap Update…

I’m just not smelling the love…..it’s gone…completely.

Sometimes things just don’t turn out like you expect or want and even though we were careful with the Monoi de Tahiti Tiare the saponification process has destroyed the natural scent of the Monoi.

Our soap is made via the CP (cold process) method and once the oils/water/sodium hydroxide is mixed and the raw soap is resting in the molds it heats up…sometimes getting quite hot….and it is this heat that destroyed the scent.

We never know when trying something new what is going to happen. Sometimes the scent (especially with essential oils) does not have staying power, sometimes the soap wants to ‘rice’ and at other times the soap will harden so fast you don’t have time to even get it in the molds!

I know there are websites out there who are selling ‘monoi scented soap’ but judging by our experiment it is my guess that these soaps are not naturally scented by the Monoi but instead have fragrance oil added. Not a big deal unless you are marketing your product as ‘natural’.

We have sampled several Tiare Flower fragrances and have ordered the one that most resembles the Monoi de Tahiti Tiare scent. We have no choice with this soap…in order to finish up our Pearls of Sand collection and have a cohesive scent we must add fragrance oil to this soap.

Our Pearls of Sand Sugar Scrub and Whipped Body Cream WILL be naturally scented with the Monoi.

It is our estimation that our Pearls of Sand collection will be finalized sometime in May.

Rebecca

Country Meadow Ltd.

Eco-Friendly Spa Products

Gentle on your body…

Gentle on the earth…

New Logo

www.countrymeadowltd.com

Mon 17 Mar '08

Reminder…..Sale Ends March 24, 2008

Happy St. Patrick’s Day!

Quick reminder – Our Around the Corner Sale will end on March 24, 2008.

Now On Sale

The following products are now on sale.
Limited to quantity in stock.
Sale ends March 24, 2008.

Birch Soap

Mechanic’s Orange Spice Soap

Hawaiian White Ginger Soap

Island Breeze Soap

Plumeria Soap

For discontinued and clearance items check out our Clearance Page

~~~

Now Available

We have one Patchouli Vanilla Soap Log

and two Treasure Island Soap Logs

made, cured and ready to ship!

~~~

Also don’t forget to sign up for our newsletter. We are networking with related businesses to bring you special offers and discounts. Only our subscribers will qualify!

~~~

Rebecca

Country Meadow

Eco-Friendly Spa Products

Gentle on your body…

Gentle on the earth…

New Logo

www.countrymeadowltd.com

Thu 13 Mar '08

Paper Vs. Plastic…No Easy Choice…

When we do our grocery shopping we use fabric reusable bags. Before that we usually opted for the paper bags…

But there really is no easy choice….there are pro’s and con’s with either option and it seems like you make a bad choice either way unless you go for the reusable fabric bags.

(for a cool interactive click on the Paper or Plastic link below)

****

Paper or Plastic?

By Kari Huus

Reporter

MSNBC

When San Francisco became the first U.S. city to prohibit large grocery stores and pharmacies from distributing disposable plastic bags in March 2007, it appeared to have sparked a trend. At least a dozen other cities, counties and states were soon considering proposals to ban or severely restrict distribution of what many environmentalists consider a wasteful and harmful product.

The plastics industry had no intention of allowing the San Francisco model to spread without a fight, though. It quickly and quietly joined with retailers and other business interests and launched a successful counterattack, using lobbying muscle to quash proposed bans. In the face of the onslaught, the cities have instituted voluntary recycling programs that proponents of the bans say are ineffective and likely to remain so.

And in at least two instances, plastics interests have turned the tables on their green adversaries by filing lawsuits on environmental grounds in an effort to prevent bans from taking effect.

“The plastic industry … will try to win local battle by local battle,” says Marc Mihaly, director of the environmental law center at Vermont Law School. “They will intimidate where they can. If they can’t intimidate … they will try to influence legislators.”

Plastics industry representatives attribute their successes to a growing realization that plastic bans are misguided.

“The trend is that cities who are taking a look at what San Francisco did … are all taking a step back and going toward recycling,” said Donna Dempsey, a spokeswoman for Progressive Bag Affiliates, which represents plastic bag makers.

The so-far scattered skirmishes are part of a grander battle over bags, a conflict in which plastic and paper industries are fighting for supermarket supremacy while fending off an ecological newcomer: the reusable fabric bag.

Plastic bags winning in marketplace
Plastic bags have established the clear upper hand. Nationwide, grocery stores and pharmacies go through about 92 billion plastic bags a year, compared with about 5 billion paper sacks, according to paper and plastic industry estimates.

That success also has made the light, strong polyethylene sacks a prominent target for critics. Their manufacture requires large quantities of petroleum. And, once discarded, they tend to take flight in a puff of wind, snagging in trees and fences or floating in bodies of water, where they can choke marine life and birds. As litter, a plastic bag’s life expectancy is far greater than a human’s — 1,000 years or more.

In Philadelphia, one of the cities that drafted legislation to ban plastic bag distribution by large retailers, they also have a habit of choking the city’s antiquated sewer system.

“It was a common-sense issue,” said Brian Abernathy, a legislative aide to the proposal’s sponsor, City Councilman Frank DiCicco.

But while the ban had popular support, Abernathy said, proponents were ill-prepared for the industry opposition they encountered at the first public hearing on the plan in October. Among those who spoke out against the proposal were the Philadelphia-based petroleum and chemical company Sunoco; the state’s food merchants association; bag wholesalers and distributors; the American Chemistry Council, which represents plastic and chemical companies; and the Progressive Bag Alliance, as the plastic bag makers trade group was formerly known.

In short order, the proposed ban was withdrawn and, after meetings with representatives of the opposition, the sponsors agreed to implement a voluntary program to recycle plastic bags instead.

Other cities and counties that considered bans on disposable bags but instead approved bag recycling programs include New York City; Austin, Texas; Phoenix; Annapolis, Md.; and Los Angeles County.

Legal test unfolds in California
Environmentalists and business interests are closely watching a key legal test unfolding in Alameda County, Calif., where the plastics industry and related businesses are using the California Environmental Quality Act to challenge a ban on nonbiodegradable plastic bags approved by Oakland in July 2007.

The plaintiff in the lawsuit is the Coalition to Support Plastic Bag Recycling, a group that includes seven plastic bag manufacturers, a plastic recycler in Texas and Kevin Kelly, “a taxpayer, residing in the city of Oakland,” who also is the president of the California Bag and Film Federation.

The coalition argues that the measure violated a provision of the state law requiring that a study of the possible adverse environmental consequences of the policy be conducted before enactment. Alameda County Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch agreed in a preliminary ruling, halting implementation of the ban, which would have taken effect Jan. 17, until the lawsuit is heard.

The complaint states that the ban will force consumers to use more paper bags, “which are more costly, generate more pollutants during manufacturing and require more energy to produce and recycle than plastic bags.” It also alleges that the continued use of biodegradable plastic bags, allowed under the ban, would “contaminate” recycling programs for disposable plastic bags.

Backers of the ban say the plastics industry is misusing a law intended to protect the environment by seeking to equate a policy decision with a construction project.

“They are corrupting the environmental impact review,” said Marissa Arrona, policy aide to Oakland City Councilwoman Nancy Nadel, who co-sponsored the ordinance. “If every effort a city wants to make requires an impact study … they wouldn’t be able to do anything.”

‘That’s a lot out of the budget’
While Oakland decided to fight the lawsuit, an identical legal challenge by the same group forced another California town to back off plans to ban disposable plastic bags. The City Council in Fairfax, population 7,000, proposed a plastic bag ban in July that would have extended to all retailers, but dropped it when faced with the prospect of an expensive environmental impact report.

“They were calling for a full-blown environmental impact report, which can cost $100,000,” said City Councilman Lew Tremaine. “That is a lot out of the budget of a little town.”

The council instead passed an ordinance making the ban voluntary.

But Fairfax residents have begun collecting signatures aimed at putting the ban on the ballot as a local initiative in November. If passed, it would be exempt from the environmental assessment process.

In its drive to defeat bans on disposable bags, the plastics industry and its retail allies have become the loudest voices in favor of bag recycling.

“The trend is clear that recycling is the best solution,” said Keith Christman, senior director of packaging at Progressive Bag Affiliates, an arm of the American Chemistry Council. “It can be made into other stuff, as long as it becomes recognized and (people) see that it can be a valuable commodity.”

But critics say that plastic bag recycling has never proven effective on a large scale. Between 1 and 5 percent of plastic shopping bags distributed by retailers are typically recovered through such programs, according to Darby Hoover, a recycling expert with the Natural  Resources Defense Council.

Bags foul recycling machinery
One reason for the low rate is that municipal curbside recycling programs that collect glass, paper, plastic and aluminum products can’t easily deal with loose plastic bags, which tend to get caught in and jam sorting equipment at recycling facilities. Some curbside programs will take plastic bags if they are bundled, but even then the commodity is low-grade and brings a low price because it gets dirty during handling and transportation.

These problems force the plastic industry to champion an approach that relies on consumers to return clean plastic bags to recycling containers at stores. While such collection points have been in existence for years in some areas, in-store recycling has never caught on.

The market for recycled plastic bags also is tiny. At the moment, a single manufacturer, the Trex Co. of Winchester, Va., purchases 70 percent of the plastic bags recovered nationwide, mixing the plastic with wood scraps to make outdoor decking. But the company lost $75 million last year, raising questions about the long-term viability of the end market.

Despite such problems, some cities are still optimistic that plastic bag recycling can work with enough support.

Among the most aggressive is Phoenix, where discussions by the City Council of a ban on disposable plastic bags instead led to a citywide bag recovery program called “Bag Central Station.” The program allows any plastic bag — regardless of where it was distributed — to be returned at any of the prominently marked receptacles placed with retail outlets. The city has coupled the recycling push with education efforts and a large giveaway of reusable bags.

Al Shiya, a spokesman for the Phoenix Public Works Department, said the program was the result of a “very concerted effort on the part of Arizona grocers to respond in a positive way to a threat on the part of some City Council people to ban plastic bags.”

The program, which took effect in November, will be assessed in June.

Recycling tests can lead to bans
If the recycling numbers don’t stack up, however, Phoenix and others could end up taking a look at restrictions.

That is how San Francisco ended up with its ban on disposable plastic bags. The ordinance, which went into effect Nov. 1, mandates that large grocery stores and pharmacies (over $1 million in annual revenue) can distribute only paper bags with 40 percent recycled content, compostable plastic bags and reusable bags.

The city first considered charging a fee for plastic bags — an idea it borrowed from Ireland, where a per-bag fee imposed in 2002 caused plastic bag usage to decline more than 90 percent. This idea met strong opposition from grocers, however, leading city officials to institute a trial recycling program for plastic bags.

While the trial was under way, the state of California — with support from the plastics industry — passed a bill requiring large retail stores to accept plastic bags for recycling. The bill also was amended to bar local governments from imposing fees on plastic bags.

When San Francisco’s trial program came to an end, it was deemed a failure by the city because grocers didn’t provide verifiable figures on the number of bags that were recycled, citing trade secrets, said Mark Westlund, a spokesman for the city’s Department of the Environment.

Dave Heylen, a spokesman for the California Grocers Association, which represents about 500 grocers, confirmed “there was a disagreement on the numbers.” He said consumers returned 7.6 million plastic bags to participating stores during the trial, surpassing the goal by 1.5 million, but “San Francisco felt the numbers weren’t collected correctly.”

With no option remaining to place a fee on the bags, Westlund said San Francisco saw few choices.

‘One alternative … ban them outright’
“We only had one alternative, and that was to ban them outright,” he said.

While the aggressive stance of the plastics industry has dampened interest in plastic bag bans, it has not completely halted such measures. In Santa Monica, Calif., the City Council is drafting a ban that some environmentalists say will go well beyond San Francisco’s and avert a legal challenge such as the one faced by Oakland.

“This is too big of a problem to recycle our way out of,” said Sarah Abramson, coast resources director at nonprofit environmental group Heal the Bay in Santa Monica.

And in Annapolis, Md., proponents of a proposed ban that turned into a recycling program say that they at least managed to set aggressive targets that — if not met — could trigger tougher action.

“We have legislation to require major retail chains to aggressively market reusable bags to reduce use of plastic bags by 40 percent,” said City Councilman Sam Shropshire. “If they can’t do it we will put the ban back on the table.”

In the meantime, at least one retailer is getting out of the plastic bag arena altogether.

Whole Foods Market recently announced that it will eliminate the use of plastic bags in all of its U.S. stores by Earth Day, April 22. The chain will then provide customers only with paper bags made of 100 percent recycled material and reusable bags.

***

Rebecca

Country Meadow Ltd.

Eco-Friendly Spa Products

Gentle on your body…

Gentle on the earth…

New Logo

www.countrymeadowltd.com

 

« Previous Entries